This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is considered part of expand)
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Oct 2004 22:00:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is considered part of expand)
- References: <20041013035800.17967.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 22:00 -------
Subject: Bug 17967
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: pinskia@gcc.gnu.org 2004-10-14 22:00:07
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog tree-cfg.c
Log message:
2004-10-14 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
PR middle-end/17967
Revert:
* tree-cfg.c (remove_usless_stmts_cond): Fold statement.
(remove_useless_stmts_1): Fold trees we know how to fold.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.5885&r2=2.5886
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.75&r2=2.76
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17967