This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/17866] std::allocator fails on CV-related types
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Oct 2004 01:23:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/17866] std::allocator fails on CV-related types
- References: <20041006190458.17866.igodard@pacbell.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 01:23 -------
"
The code shown in the report does not make sense: You can't put a
const T in a standard sequence.
**** People have figured out that there is another issue with allocator. ***
So the PR is doubly invalid :-)
''
**** is the sentence which I was taking about which says that the allocator cannot says it cannot be
used with const types so I was right in closing the bug as a dup of that one. And since Ivan later on
said that he is trying to use const T in a standard sequence well then it is a more of a dup. Since Gaby
already confirmed in the other bug that this is not a bug. I still don't see why you are questing my
closing as a dup when if you read the sentence I highlight here says that this bug is indead invalid.
If you look at that other bug you see that you even commented in that bug asking the same question:
"libstdc++ people: is there anything in the standard about this case? " so why are you asking again
even when both Paolo and Gaby responded and I even pointted out the section in the standard which
says that this would be invalid.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16875 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17866