This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/17474] [4.0 Regression] Compiling at -01 yields different results


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-14 06:07 -------
These all look wrong:
-  T.235_214 = codes_85->data[i_910];
+  codes_880 = T.291_849;
+  T.235_214 = *codes_880;

-  codes_85->data[i_910] = code_19;
+  T.287_876 = &codes_85->data[0];
+  T.288_873 = (<unnamed type>) i_910;
+  T.289_856 = (int *) T.288_873;
+  T.290_851 = T.289_856 * 4B;
+  T.291_849 = T.290_851 + T.287_876;
+  codes_847 = T.291_849;
+  codes_847->length = code_298;

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
          Component|java                        |tree-optimization
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17474


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]