This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: java/io/natFile.cc:106: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed.


Hello,

> >>While you are around there, can you rename it to tree-loop-ivopts?
> >>
> >>(I have no idea why zdenek keeps naming switches in ways that are
> >>completely different than how we've been naming them :P).
> >
> >since I do not like the convention.
> 
> This is not a good reason.
> 
> If you want to convert *all* the switches, do so.
> If not, the new switches should be consistent with the old ones.
> 
> Understand that I could care less whether it's -fivopts or -fivcanon. I 
> care that it's not consistent with the existing options.
> 
> Being consistent in our interface to the user is important.
> Simply because you don't like the existing convention doesn't mean you 
> should just start using your own.

should not this remark apply to the first person creating a
-ftree-anything switch?  I just (unlike this first person) stick with
the older convention that there is no such convention and everyone just
names the switches the way he likes :-).

Zdenek


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]