This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: java/io/natFile.cc:106: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed.
Hello,
> >>While you are around there, can you rename it to tree-loop-ivopts?
> >>
> >>(I have no idea why zdenek keeps naming switches in ways that are
> >>completely different than how we've been naming them :P).
> >
> >since I do not like the convention.
>
> This is not a good reason.
>
> If you want to convert *all* the switches, do so.
> If not, the new switches should be consistent with the old ones.
>
> Understand that I could care less whether it's -fivopts or -fivcanon. I
> care that it's not consistent with the existing options.
>
> Being consistent in our interface to the user is important.
> Simply because you don't like the existing convention doesn't mean you
> should just start using your own.
should not this remark apply to the first person creating a
-ftree-anything switch? I just (unlike this first person) stick with
the older convention that there is no such convention and everyone just
names the switches the way he likes :-).
Zdenek