This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/16940] implicit none over-riding module declaration
- From: "paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Aug 2004 18:44:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/16940] implicit none over-riding module declaration
- References: <20040809143128.16940.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-08-29 18:43 -------
Subject: Re: implicit none over-riding module declaration
Yeah, I thought it was really strange too. It is only be chance that I
notice the fix of removing the IMPLICT NONE.
Paul T
----- Original Message -----
From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: <paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: [Bug fortran/16940] implicit none over-riding module declaration
>
> ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-29
17:40 -------
> What is funky is that with IMPLICIT NONE removed, we generate a call to
the
> right function (the one for real arguments) eSomething really weird seems
to be
> going on here.
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16940
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16940