This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/12602] -pthreads and -threads undocumented for almost every target
- From: "cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Jul 2004 11:30:26 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/12602] -pthreads and -threads undocumented for almost every target
- References: <20031013204500.12602.sebor@roguewave.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2004-07-13 11:30 -------
Subject: Re: -pthreads and -threads undocumented for almost every target
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:53:18AM -0000, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-13 10:53 -------
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01327.html
>
> --
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |FIXED
> Target Milestone|--- |3.3.5
Excuse my insistence, but why do you consider this PR resolved? AFAICT
you added documentation for the Sparc platform, but what about (e.g.)
x86? There is documentation for a Mingw32 specific option -mthreads,
but no documentation for -pthread (or was it -pthreads?).
The reason I bring this up again is PR#11953. It would help if the
effects of -pthread were documented if you need to detect at compile
time whether -pthread was on the command line.
Regards
Christoph
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12602