This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/15653] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code


------- Additional Comments From vmakarov at redhat dot com  2004-06-15 16:11 -------
When I wrote the patch I worked on kernel_time.c.  And the pacth solves the
problem with the test.

The test lock.c has another reason for the crash.  It is in code putting additional
nops between shift insn and a dependent insn.  This code is specific for
itanium1 only.  As I see it does not work when the next insn is an asm insn.

I'll send a patch for solving this problem too.  I don't think we should pay
attention to legacy hardware like itanium1.  Could somebody tell me how many
itanium1 machines are used now? And who are using them?  I think we should
remove code supporting Itanium1.

Vlad

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15653


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]