This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/15848] Invalid GIMPLE generated
- From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jun 2004 15:00:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15848] Invalid GIMPLE generated
- References: <20040606133436.15848.dberlin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dberlin at dberlin dot org 2004-06-06 15:00 -------
Subject: Re: Invalid GIMPLE generated
> I have seen this too but I do not know if this is invalid GIMPLE or
> not. I think the problem is that &a is
> being considered a constant (if this is invalid GIMPLE).
>
Jason Merrill said:
I don't think that's valid; I thought we had decided that the cast
needs to
be separate from the addr_expr. Looks like a bug to me.
Which is why i filed it as a bug :).
If this isn't a bug, we probably need to mention that &a can be
considered a constant in tree-ssa.texi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15848