This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/15744] [3.5 Regression] libcpp versus bootstrap compiler
- From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Jun 2004 08:00:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/15744] [3.5 Regression] libcpp versus bootstrap compiler
- References: <20040531071624.15744.ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu dot org 2004-06-05 08:00 -------
The solutions are two:
1) making bool fail if it is not what the current GCC will use. This requires
more configure magic than one would think because e.g. Darwin has a 4-byte bool.
2) removing usage of stdbool.h, which Zack proposed and which I think is a good
idea (especially before someone starts relying on bool semantics and breaks
things even more horribly).
Paolo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15744