This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/15178] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Solaris 9/x86 fails linking after stage 3
- From: "ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 May 2004 16:25:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/15178] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Solaris 9/x86 fails linking after stage 3
- References: <20040427200510.15178.markus.doehr@siegenia-aubi.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-05-18 16:25 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] Solaris 9/x86 fails linking after stage 3
amk at krell dot zikzak dot de writes:
> I've stumbled across the same problem here on a new
> Sun Fire V20z with Solaris 9 4/04 (entire distribution).
> Instead of using SUN's cc, I used the pre-built gcc 3.4.0
> (including required libiconv) from www.sunfreeware.com
> to build my own gcc 3.4.0 (honouring all installation
> instructions).
I suppose the www.sunfreeware.com guys did the build on Solaris 9/x86
without the assembler patch 115114-01: this introduced as 7.1, compared to
as 7.0 as distributed with Solaris 9 FCS. It may be (but I've not checked)
that some S9 update integrated that patch. This is also currently my
workaround for this problem: keep a copy of as 7.0 around and use that one.
> While some people suggested to install GNU binutils (as, ld),
> neither version 2.14 nor 2.15 compiles successfully. Bad luck,
> but I haven't done further investigation on this new issue
> because I'd prefer to get it to work with /usr/ccs/bin/{as,ld}
> anyway. ;-)
Same here, although I have been able to build binutils 2.14 and 2.15 on
Solaris 10/x86 without problems.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15178