This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/15292] libgfortran depends on c99 functionality round and roundf
- From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 May 2004 13:24:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/15292] libgfortran depends on c99 functionality round and roundf
- References: <20040505091406.15292.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-05 13:24 -------
Subject: Re: libgfortran depends on c99 functionality
round and roundf
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 14:03, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-05 13:03 -------
> On more thing, why has the bug in netbsd for adding these functions, round and roundf been ignored.
> http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=24252
> In fact there is a patch in there to add them.
Well, it's more likely that it's just not been processed yet, there's
currently >3000 bugs outstanding. I don't know what, if any, effort is
being put into making the C library C99 conforming [A quick search of
the mailing lists suggests that there is some activity, but it's
probably not an all-out push at this time].
Sadly NetBSD doesn't have as many folks triaging the bug database as GCC
does (and in some cases OS bugs are far harder to pin down, due to
subtle differences in HW).
In any case, that wouldn't affect NetBSD 1.6.x which is the last public
release. Nor is it likely now to affect 2.0 when that comes out (since
the release branch has now been cut).
R.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15292