This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/15011] partial ordering failure?
- From: "dave at boost-consulting dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Apr 2004 04:43:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/15011] partial ordering failure?
- References: <20040419143857.15011.dave@boost-consulting.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dave at boost-consulting dot com 2004-04-25 04:42 -------
You're right that I don't follow the core reflector. I just want to be clear
that I'm not claiming to know which compiler does the right thing, if any.
I'm just reporting what EDG says to me about this issue.
I will note again that issue 214 is voted into the WP. Whether or not issue
214 rules definitively on this particular case (Nathan seems to think it
does), and whether or not GCC ought to be compatible with issues that have
been voted into the WP, are questions for you people to decide.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15011