This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
- From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Apr 2004 22:12:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
- References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-13 22:12 -------
Jason, I agree with your assessment.
This is looking far too involved to be considering at this point.
Please revert your earlier patch, so that things are consistent, and then either
close or retarget this PR.
(It appears to me that this outcome means that standards-conforming programs do
not follow the C++ ABI in that specializations of types in "std" are mangled
incorrectly. That's observable to user programs by using "typeid". This is
presumably a bug in our library implementation, but one that's not easy to fix,
and hopefully not terribly important to anybody.)
Thank you for persevering with this issue; without having gone this far, we
probably would not have known what the issues were.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294