This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Apr 2004 22:49:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
- References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-04-08 22:49 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Ahh. I see, now. You want
|
| B::f<int>(B::X<int>&)
|
| instead of the current
|
| B::f<int>(A::X<int>&)
|
| Yes, this would probably be the most consistent. So, I guess ugly it is...
Everybody is saying it is ugly, but I can't see why.
Can someone help me?
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294