This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Mar 2004 22:47:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
- References: <20030729120327.11706.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 22:47 -------
Subject: Re: std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes
code
gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
>| >The only fix that I should have applied is to make __cmath_power()
>| >inline.
>| >
>| So, after all, Steven (#1) was right, why didn't you acknowldege that 6
>| months ago?
>
>Because
>
> (1) some data was provided later, not before.
>
>
The last data was provided December, 6th, three full months. Do you
think free
software implies slow feedback?
> (2) It is less harm than what you'd like to do.
>
>
I have decided nothing, I have time 'til at least the summer.
>You *believe* I do not do anything. Yes, I'm not in rush into
>papering over problems; but it does not mean I do nothing.
>
>
Of course, mine was a rethorical exageration: you do "nothing" in proportion
to what you could actually do, given your background and your role.
Paolo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11706