This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
- From: "wilson at specifixinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Mar 2004 19:08:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
- References: <20040303084331.14402.wilson@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-03-03 19:08 -------
Subject: Re: gccbug confusion
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-03 16:22 -------
> gccbug still works.
I stand corrected. My bug report was prompted by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2004-02/msg02598.html
which was sent by gccbug but did not result in a bugzilla bug report.
However, perhaps this is a SuSE specific problem. Or maybe this was
user error. I will have to ask.
There is also the issue of whether invoke.texi should recommend gccbug
or not. Wolfgang Bangerth seemed to think it shouldn't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402