This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11864] [3.3 regression] miscompiles zero extention and test
- From: "joern dot rennecke at superh dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Mar 2004 13:27:51 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11864] [3.3 regression] miscompiles zero extention and test
- References: <20030809063003.11864.kkojima@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From joern dot rennecke at superh dot com 2004-03-02 13:27 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles zero extention and test
> ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02 13:07 -------
> I just bootstrapped/regtested the backported patch on SPARC64 without a hitch.
> The 2 testcases also passed. Any reason why you didn't backport them alongside
> the patch (no, again, the filenames are in the message linked to above :-)?
None in particular; I just thought that regressions are only likely to
appear on the mainline.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11864