This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/14220] New: num_put::do_put() undesired float/double behavior
- From: "sadfate at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Feb 2004 01:38:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/14220] New: num_put::do_put() undesired float/double behavior
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
When a float or double is streamed to output in fixed-point format, rounding up
occurs well before the precision specified by the stream.
5.55555555e-17, when streamed to a stream with the scientific flag set and a
precision of 25 will print 5.55555555[#'s-up-to-20]e-17. When streamed with the
fixed flag set, it will print out 0.0000000000000000560000000. If the number is
especially small (e-20+), it will print out as all zeroes.
I looked at the code in 3.2.3 and 3.4 versions of g++, and saw that it was
because the max_digits is being set from the numeric_limits<double>::digits10
field. The precision is then set to be less than or equal to the max_digits.
So on my platform, where digits10 is 16 (+2), the precision will get set to 18,
max. That works fine for scientific values, but I would argue that if I ask a
stream for 25 places of precision, and put a float/double into it that should be
represented by 0.0000000000000000555555555, that I would see that value, not a
rounded version.
My understanding is that the numeric_limits<double>::digits10 value for a
float/double amounts to the significant digits if it were in scientific
notation. If that is the case, then the max_digits for fixed number would be
digits10 + the number of preceding zeroes, which is probably max_exponent10.
This was seen on Solaris 8 and Irix 6.5.22.
--
Summary: num_put::do_put() undesired float/double behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 3.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sadfate at yahoo dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14220