This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/12025] combined build of i960 coff fails
- From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Oct 2003 03:18:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12025] combined build of i960 coff fails
- References: <20030821220644.12025.dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12025
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wilson at tuliptree dot org
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-10-18 03:18 -------
If the i960 port really is dead, why don't we deprecate it in 3.4 (or even remove it)? As for those
who claim they need it, they can always keep the current source. I just don't see the point in
keeping something nonbuildable and unmaintained in the tree. What you think?