This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug optimization/12209] [3.4 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap Cygwin with -funit-at-a-time


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12209



------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz  2003-10-10 16:37 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap Cygwin with -funit-at-a-time

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
> 
> 
> dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |dannysmith at gcc dot gnu
>                    |                            |dot org
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-10 08:11 -------
> > Danny, is the assumption that fastcall is
> > valid for all targets that use TARGET_STACK_PROBE
> > correct?
> 
> No, I forgot test for !TARGET_64BIT.  

I think that you won't get into that code path at all in 64bit mode.
The patch looks fine to me.  Can you please send it to gcc-patches?
(actually I finally found time to write about the same thing :)
Thanks!

Honza
> 
> Danny
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]