This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/12209] [3.4 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap Cygwin with -funit-at-a-time
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Oct 2003 16:37:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/12209] [3.4 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap Cygwin with -funit-at-a-time
- References: <20030908142116.12209.kcook@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2003-10-10 16:37 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap Cygwin with -funit-at-a-time
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
>
>
> dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |dannysmith at gcc dot gnu
> | |dot org
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-10 08:11 -------
> > Danny, is the assumption that fastcall is
> > valid for all targets that use TARGET_STACK_PROBE
> > correct?
>
> No, I forgot test for !TARGET_64BIT.
I think that you won't get into that code path at all in 64bit mode.
The patch looks fine to me. Can you please send it to gcc-patches?
(actually I finally found time to write about the same thing :)
Thanks!
Honza
>
> Danny
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.