This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm
- From: "falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 1 Oct 2003 09:29:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm
- References: <20030706115750.11442.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-01 09:29 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm
"rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> You can't put any "asm" in your source code that requires more than
> 4 bytes per statement. You have ".skip 16" operations which are
> violating this constraint and consequently gcc gets confused in a
> way which can only be detected by the assembler.
Is this something ARM specific? I can't find anything in the manual
about it. If it's a general statement, we can also close 12108.
> The compiler does not parse the body of asm statements to divine
> their meaning.
But it does count the ;'s?