This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/11699] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error, unrecognized instruction.
- From: "cgd at broadcom dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Aug 2003 20:35:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/11699] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error, unrecognized instruction.
- References: <20030728220936.11699.cgd@broadcom.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
------- Additional Comments From cgd at broadcom dot com 2003-08-07 20:35 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] internal compiler
error, unrecognized instruction.
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:05:39 +0000 (UTC), "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote:
> I don't think anyone has defined an abicalls version of EABI.
> Perhaps it would be best to just report an error in this case.
> What do you think?
that'd be reasonable.
now i'm wondering why it was "OK" with no explicit relocs... i guess
the assembler was falling back to *something* which at least
compiled/assembled...
cgd