This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11105] [3.3/3.4 regression of sorts] ICE in mangle_conv_op_name_for_type
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Aug 2003 18:14:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11105] [3.3/3.4 regression of sorts] ICE in mangle_conv_op_name_for_type
- References: <20030605233918.11105.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-07 18:14 -------
I think what Mark wants to say is the following: the old state was that the compiler
silently generated code that might not have worked. The original "fix" was to have it
generate an error to notify you of this. The fix to 11105 then changed the error to
a working compiler that just did the right thing. It's true that this changed the ABI,
but since it changed it from a nonfunctional to a functional state, it's not an ABI change
that can break existing, working code. In this respect, we're still backward compatible
and there is no need to guard the fix with -fabi-version=x.
W.