This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11105] [3.3/3.4 regression of sorts] ICE in mangle_conv_op_name_for_type


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105



------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-08-07 18:14 -------
I think what Mark wants to say is the following: the old state was that the compiler 
silently generated code that might not have worked. The original "fix" was to have it 
generate an error to notify you of this. The fix to 11105 then changed the error to 
a working compiler that just did the right thing. It's true that this changed the ABI, 
but since it changed it from a nonfunctional to a functional state, it's not an ABI change 
that can break existing, working code. In this respect, we're still backward compatible 
and there is no need to guard the fix with -fabi-version=x. 
 
W.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]