This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11768] confusing error message in specialized template (with two-stage name lookup)


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11768



------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-03 09:49 -------
This is the intended behavior as opposed to
'void X<i>::foo()' for the declaration like
  template <int i> struct X {
    ...
  };

I think a space between the two '<' in the
diagnostics would be nicer.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]