This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug pch/11058] ICE on using precompiled header; Alpha Red Hat 7.1 Linux
- From: "mckelvey at maskull dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jun 2003 05:09:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug pch/11058] ICE on using precompiled header; Alpha Red Hat 7.1 Linux
- References: <20030602021401.11058.mckelvey@maskull.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11058
------- Additional Comments From mckelvey@maskull.com 2003-06-07 05:09 -------
Subject: Re: ICE on using precompiled header; Alpha Red Hat 7.1 Linux
On Friday 06 June 2003 18:12 pm, gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11058
>
>
> bangerth@dealii.org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- Status|WAITING |NEW
> Ever Confirmed| |1
> Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-07 01:12:35
> date| |
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth@dealii.org 2003-06-07 01:12
> ------- I can't reproduce this on my x86-linux box. Actually, the provided
> information is all the bug reporting instructions require, so put back out
> of WAITING.
>
> As a last question: can you reproduce the failure with the
> preprocessed sources as well? Or does it only fail if you
> precompile your header without running the preprocessor on it
> separately?
>
> Thanks
> W.
I just tried it, and it compiled fine when I built the .h.gch from the
precompiled sources.
I should also mention that I tried it on a Solaris 2.7.1 SPARC with a recent
CVS build and it crashed there as well.
Thanx,
Jim McKelvey