This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug optimization/8776] loop invariants are not removed (most likely)


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8776


dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
  GCC build triplet|                            |i686-pc-linux-gnu
   GCC host triplet|                            |i686-pc-linux-gnu
 GCC target triplet|                            |i686-linux-pc-gnu
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-06-04 19:50:50
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-04 19:50 -------
Hello,

your problem as stated is fixed on gcc 3.3 branch and mainline. Please note that -O9 is the same 
thing as -O3 (-On for n>3 is identical to -O3). Second, your code performs identically for me with 
-O3, -O3 -DSLOW1 and -O3 -DSLOW2 with gcc 3.3. With gcc mainline, things are somewhat more 
bizarre. With -O3, or -O3 -DSLOW1, the code is about 50% slower than with gcc 3.3, but with -O3 
-DSLOW2 it's the same speed as gcc 3.3 (ie faster than the with the other two options). Very 
strange.

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]