This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86
- From: "rearnsha at arm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jun 2003 12:25:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86
- References: <20030601111629.11052.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha@arm.com 2003-06-03 12:25 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault)
compiling xfree86
> Well, you're the ARM maintainer, so I suspect your analysis is much closer... Also could be because
> I'm using cross compilers (sorry, very important details)...
I'm not saying you are wrong, just that I'm not seeing what you are
seeing. Which concerns me somewhat. And I was using a cross-compiler
too...
Is there any chance you could have another look at the failure you are
seeing and tell me what the "insn" is in frame 2
#2 0x002379b0 in reload_cse_move2add (first=0xe2b8f0) at reload1.c:9249
reload.c:9249: note_stores (PATTERN (insn), move2add_note_store, NULL);
R.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.