This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/10193] Regression: iostreams no longer threadsafe
- From: "ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Jun 2003 22:21:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/10193] Regression: iostreams no longer threadsafe
- References: <20030323192600.10193.peturr02@ru.is>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10193
ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-02 22:21 -------
There is consensus from the library maintainers that libstdc++-v3
has a statement of thread safety and that the implementation meets
it within the confines of the libc implementation we layer upon, etc.
libio/libstdc++-v2 may have had stronger guaruntees. (BTW, I didn't
repoll all such maintainers rather this position is from the last time we
discussed it.)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.