This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ICE building Linux 2.4.20 sched.c on x86
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 15:17:33 -0400
- Subject: Re: ICE building Linux 2.4.20 sched.c on x86
Bugzilla keeps track of the most duplicate bugs,
From the new bug page:
Before reporting a bug, please read the bug writing guidelines, please
look at the list of most frequently reported bugs, and please search
for the bug
frequently reported bugs is link to bugs which have large number of
duplicates <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/duplicates.cgi> so at least
when people go to enter a new bug, they might see that and look at the
reported bugs.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Sunday, Jun 1, 2003, at 15:12 US/Eastern, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
Hello,
we've just now had our third submission of this particular bug to
bugzilla (10890 is the original, 11007 and 11053 are the duplicate).
Given that a lot of people are going to use gcc 3.3 to compile their
kernels, many of them on x86. I think it'd be great if somebody could
analyze this, determine if this ice-on-legal or ice-on-illegal, and
put a note in a prominent location to that effect. I suspect it will
save a lot of future headache. Perhaps the priority on it should also
be raised? Thanks,
Dara