This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/10069] -include switch is improperly handled
- From: "sean at mcneil dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 May 2003 19:07:29 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/10069] -include switch is improperly handled
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10069
------- Additional Comments From sean@mcneil.com 2003-05-27 19:07 -------
Subject: Re: -include switch is improperly handled
This appears to have been fixed a while ago. I'm sorry for not sending
a notice to that effect back when I first noticed. I had assumed
someone fixed it because of my bug report.
Thanks,
Sean
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 11:21, pinskia@physics.uc.edu wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10069
>
>
> pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-27 18:21 -------
> I tried to reproduce this bug on the mainline (20030527):
> g++ -c -include big.h testpch.c
> and it worked, Can you try to see if this bug is fixed now?
>
> (ignore the file names I had used it to test a different patch of mine).
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.