This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/7549] gcc3.1: Documentation glitches in info-files
- From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 May 2003 21:26:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/7549] gcc3.1: Documentation glitches in info-files
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-05-26 21:26 -------
Hello,
I'm not sure what the issue you describe here is. Examining the online docs, which I assume are
similar to the texinfo ones, -Wall says:
-Wall
All of the above -W options combined. This enables all the warnings about constructions that
some users consider questionable, and that are easy to avoid (or modify to prevent the warning),
even in conjunction with macros. This also enables some language-specific warnings described in
C++ Dialect Options and Objective-C Dialect Options.
Furthermore, -fdata-sections and -ffunction-sections are included in the manual as global
options, and are not specifically mentioned to support hp-ux. Do you think we should specify
which targets they do not support? Thanks,
Dara
P.S. We really need to have a section for documentation bugs...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.