This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/10138] -Wuninitialized could catch uninitialized arrays
- From: "h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio dot no" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 May 2003 19:05:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/10138] -Wuninitialized could catch uninitialized arrays
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138
------- Additional Comments From h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no 2003-05-26 19:05 -------
Subject: Re: [Bug other/10138] -Wuninitialized could catch uninitialized arrays
pinskia@physics.uc.edu writes:
> The second suggestion is already a different bug, and that is why I
> just changed it to this one(see bug 179).
No, bug 179 is a another bug, where - use(&i) would actually prevent
a preceding -Wuninitialized warning. What I'd like is for use(&i)
itself to give a warning.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.