This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,jh at suse dot cz, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, snyder at fnal dot gov,gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 20:40:46 +0200
- Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC
- References: <20030515044154.13972.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
> Synopsis: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC
>
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Thu May 15 04:41:54 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> So, Scott, what's your verdict: should it be closed? What's
> the state on the 3.3 branch?
>
> Other question: if it's "fixed" by just disabling something
> (is this what you mean by "switching off") -- will we see
> the problem happening again if this code patch is switched
> on again by someone? Or was the code that produced the
> wrong code removed altogether? If this isn't the case, then
> I'd say we should keep the report, but lacking technical
> insight I leave this up to you.
Can you point me to the patch? I was off for a while and missed the
thread. In case the fast prologues was disabled, I would like to fix
the real problem instead.
Honza