This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Old Java PRs

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,<java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:45:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Old Java PRs
References: <F4EF08F4-842A-11D7-BDFC-000393681B36@yahoo.com><Pine.LNX.4.44.0305121048160.24140-100000@ops2.one-point.com>

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Sun, 11 May 2003, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
 > > Java/1111	Order matters for inline candidates
 > 
 > Unless I misunderstand this PR, it is fixed by the new inliner (except for
 > the bytecode frontend, which still does not emit whole functions as
 > trees).

It isn't.  The new inliner still will not inline functions until they
have been expanded.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Old Java PRs
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Old Java PRs
  - From: Dara Hazeghi

References:
- Old Java PRs
  - From: Dara Hazeghi
- Re: Old Java PRs
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]