This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10487: ICE with unsigned long long and -m128bit-long-double
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: SLeard at IEEE dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Apr 2003 00:37:29 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/10487: ICE with unsigned long long and -m128bit-long-double
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, SLeard at IEEE dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Old Synopsis: syscalls.cc:68: internal error: Segmentation fault
New Synopsis: ICE with unsigned long long and -m128bit-long-double
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 25 00:37:28 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. Here's a C testcase:
-----------------------
unsigned long long int i;
void foo()
{
double x = (double)i;
}
---------------------
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/gcc -c x.c -m128bit-long-double
x.c: In function `foo':
x.c:4: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
This ICEs since 3.0, 2.95 didn't have this option, so it
is not a regression.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10487