This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10468: Type interpreted as int& instead of const int&
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, mgoodman at csua dot berkeley dot edu, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Apr 2003 21:47:57 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/10468: Type interpreted as int& instead of const int&
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, mgoodman at csua dot berkeley dot edu, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: Type interpreted as int& instead of const int&
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 23 21:47:56 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Why should it be different than what gcc does? Can you
point to a certain paragraph in the standard? I'd think
gcc is right.
Wolfgang
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10468