This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double classdefinition in expand_expr
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
- To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- Cc: rassahah at neofonie dot de, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:21:11 -0500 (CDT)
- Subject: Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double classdefinition in expand_expr
> Why is this listed as 3.4 regression? I get "confused by earlier errors" on
> 3.3, which means ICE if compiled with self-check. I think it's a 3.3/3.4
> regression, on error recovery.
Good question. You're right in any case, and I changed the synopsis.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/