This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is this a bug?

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Songtao Chen <songtao at cisco dot com>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:45:52 +0000
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030102163940.02192b80@toque.cisco.com>

Songtao Chen wrote:-

> Hi Neil,
> 
> Thanks for replying.
> 
> Can you tell me why the parentheses are irrelevant,
> any doc to support that?

For the same reason that (2) is the same as 2, and not 3.  Like I said,
post-increment returns the value before incrementing.

Neil.

> 
> Songtao
> 
> At 09:23 PM 1/2/2003 +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> >Songtao Chen wrote:-
> >
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> It appears to be a bug to me.
> >
> >No, i++ returns the value before increment.  Parentheses are irrelevant.
> >
> >Neil.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this a bug?
  - From: Songtao Chen

References:
- Is this a bug?
  - From: Songtao Chen
- Re: Is this a bug?
  - From: Songtao Chen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]