This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures inexecute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: <davem at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, <rth at redhat dot com>, <davem at redhat dot com>, <jakub at redhat dot com>, <roger at eyesopen dot com>, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:54:51 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures inexecute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
> Synopsis: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures in execute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
>
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> State-Changed-By: davem
> State-Changed-When: Mon Oct 7 00:22:29 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> Bug marked as XFAIL in current sources.
>
This is still a problem with sparc64. It probably still deserves
a Problem Report. It was marked XFAIL to indicate that it isn't
an immediate problem, i.e. a concern to GCC users, but the problem
itself hasn't gone away.
Toon's original complex division example still produces inferior
code on sparc64 than it does on 32-bit sparc. Perhaps reducing
the priority may have been more appropriate?
Just to let you know, I'm still investigating a solution.
Roger
--