This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
- From: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz at nabi dot net>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, pcarlini at unitus dot it, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:11:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/7186: DR179 for std::deque::iterator and const_iterator
- Organization: secret_agent_headquarters
- References: <20020703162257.28929.qmail@sources.redhat.com><3D23264A.8050905@unitus.it>
- Reply-to: bkoz at nabi dot net
> > Is there a survey of existing practice for this issue?
> >
> Agreed, I'm going to take care of this, surveying the existing
> practice of 3 or 4 implementations I have access too.
Great.
> > Can all but the reverse_iterator bits go in now, since that will
> > have ABI-impacting effects?
> >
> Well, as I mentioned in the PR, decoupling the reverse_iterator case
> from the "normal" iterator case seems difficult for the special
> std::deque::iterator and const_iterator case (it isn't for
> __normal_iterator, used by the other standard containers). Again, I
> will do my best in the next weeks.
Hmm.
Thanks for looking into this.
-benjamin