This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: problems w/ -traditional-cpp


On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 07:32:14AM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:

 > Here's a thought: is the code that shouldn't be there protected by
 > something like "#if !defined (FOO)" where FOO should be defined?
 > 
 > Maybe it's being compiled with -pedantic and FOO is a *built-in*
 > that is in the user's namespace?  If so, then the recent CPP
 > built-in changes we've been doing would prevent it from being
 > defined.

It's definitely not being compiled with -pedantic.

I'm not going to be able to do anything with this for a few days -- The
toolchain work I do for my Day Job has been preempted by some yak shaving,
and this weekend I really need to do some work on the house that I've been
putting off...

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]