This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cp/parse.y:2120: invalid value: $3

>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>> --On Monday, April 29, 2002 04:22:00 PM -0700 Paul Eggert
>>> <eggert@twinsun.com> wrote:

>>>> OK, but here is a more conservative patch that also avoids the
>>>> dirty hack.  This patch avoids grammar rule duplication and
>>>> should be a bit easier to maintain.

>>> Nathan, would you apply this patch to branch and mainline, please?

>> Er, it may be easier to maintain, but it also breaks the compiler.
>> With this patch, libstdc++ fails to build on the branch using bison
>> 1.28.

Jason> So I replaced it for the moment with Paul's earlier minimal
Jason> patch.

What kind of test should I run to check my submission?  I do think it
much more in the spirit of the comments.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]