This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>,"David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>,"anton at samba dot org" <anton at samba dot org>,"gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:59:27 +0100
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
References: <20020428054450.GA17500@krispykreme> <20020427.225235.08665315.davem@redhat.com> <236260000.1020019695@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020428233912.GA3698@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <256600000.1020038373@gandalf.codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell wrote:-

> Overall, this stuff is something of a mess.

I vote that these inline flags are confusing (it confused me
when doing the langhooks; I asked questions about it then
that can be seen in the mail archives), and that someone
who understands it clearly document their meaning, or reduce
the number of them 8-)

Neil.

References:
- gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Anton Blanchard
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: gcc 3.1 bug: flag_no_inline incorrectly set
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]