This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
c++/6373: Reimplementation of virtual functions in the same class works (should normally not)gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
- From: pietzowski at byterider dot biz
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Apr 2002 13:21:45 -0000
- Subject: c++/6373: Reimplementation of virtual functions in the same class works (should normally not)gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
- Reply-to: pietzowski at byterider dot biz
>Number: 6373
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: Reimplementation of virtual functions in the same class works (should normally not)gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri Apr 19 06:26:02 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Andreas Pietzowski
>Release: gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
>Organization:
>Environment:
SuSE-Linux 8.0
>Description:
Hi,
I program code for KDE with Qt under Linux. Qt has e.g a class QTable and in there they implemented this method
virtual void QTable::activateNextCell(){
// some code here
}
Now it is possible that I write in my code:
void QTable::activateNextCell(){
// some other code
}
and my reimplementation compiles and is used by the executable. Under Windows with Borlans bcc it isn't used.
The guys from Trolltech (the founders of Qt) told me I should report this behaviour to you because a compiler should never allow a reimplementation of a method of the same class (only if you create a sub-class).
Could you follow me? Was it enough info? If not please contact me via email and I'll try to explain it more detailed.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
A warning would be enough I think because the behavior of a compiler is not defined in that case I think. And prehaps don't use the reimplemented code because there is already an original implementation.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: