This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/3589: GCC 3.0-CVS illegal instruction on hppa1.1-proelf
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org, joel at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:09:17 -0600
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/3589: GCC 3.0-CVS illegal instruction on hppa1.1-proelf
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <3CA0AAE7.194CCB0B@redhat.com> <3CA0ADA7.34D73D79@OARcorp.com> <3CA0B022.D3F14211@redhat.com>
Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > >
> > > Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >
> > > >Is there any ifdef to check and decide which directives to use?
> > > >
> > > > And if there is any reference mapping between them, I would appreciate
> > > > knowing about it.
> > >
> > > Here is the path solving the problem.
> > >
> > > You could find a description of the pseudoops and mapping them into elf
> > > sections in
> > >
> > > http://segfault.net/~scut/cpu/hppa/HP_Assembler_Reference_Manual_HP9000_9th_Ed.pdf
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Could the __PRO__ (or something similar) be part of the cpp predefines
> > for this
> > configuration so non-gcc assembly can do the right thing? I know that
> > at least
> > libgloss and RTEMS have hppa assembly.
> >
>
> Yes, we could do it. But it is not urgent now. Libgloss has no
> .subspace directive so it should be compiled without problems.
OK. There are some in RTEMS but I am happy to disable them. The hppa
port (when really active) was maintained on on an hpux box using gcc
and native as/ld. So getting to the point where it is built using
all GNU tools is a plus even if all I can do is ensure it compiles. :)
> > Of course, this all begs the bigger question... how many embedded hppa
> > users
> > are there really? :)
> >
>
> I am definitely not an embedded hppa user )
Me either -- just trying to avoid bit-rot in the RTEMS hppa port. :)
> Vlad
--joel