This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

java/5986: SIGSEGV in __gcj_personality_v0



>Number:         5986
>Category:       java
>Synopsis:       SIGSEGV in __gcj_personality_v0
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Mar 17 07:16:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jeff Sturm
>Release:        gcc version 3.1 20020316 (prerelease)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.1/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc --enable-languages=c++,java --enable-threads : (reconfigured)  : (reconfigured)  : (reconfigured)  : (reconfigured)  : (reconfigured) 
Thread model: posix
>Description:
The attached program fails when compiled from bytecode.  Compiling from source works as expected.

This appears to be a new problem rather than a regression... 3.0.4 exhibits the same behavior.

I entered this as a frontend bug since the indications are that gcj is emitting either bad code or wrong unwind info.
>How-To-Repeat:
gcj -C CrashEH.java
gcj CrashEH.java --main=CrashEH -o CrashEH
./CrashEH
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]