This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 6 GCC regressions, 6 new, with your patch on 2002-01-29T19:24:37Z.
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:38:08 +0000
- Subject: Re: 6 GCC regressions, 6 new, with your patch on 2002-01-29T19:24:37Z.
- References: <200201292158.g0TLw6f14961@maat.cygnus.com> <20020129222235.GA4190@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <jmsn8ooi5w.fsf@desire.geoffk.org>
Geoff Keating wrote:-
> No, it's not a debug info issue. Look at the log file at
> <http://people.redhat.com/geoffk/gcc-regression/native-logsum/test-gdb/gdb.log.gz>; you'll see it's actually a bunch of
>
> bitfields.c:83: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
>
> warnings. I'm not sure whether the warnings are legitimate, although
> at first glance they may be.
I downloaded a log file, but seem to have gotten the wrong one as I
couldn't see anything wrong. I was just in the process of trying to
build GDB locally.
I'm fairly sure the warnings are legit; getting the right type for
bitfields naturally leads to stricter overflow warnings. I'll fix the
test cases; hopefully in the next 24 hours.
Thanks,
Neil.