This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap from scratch broken on glibc based system
- From: Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>
- To: Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,bugs at x86-64 dot org
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:11:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap from scratch broken on glibc based system
- References: <20020118215336.A15913@wotan.suse.de> <20020118160526.S32403@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20020118220904.B19176@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:09:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:05:26PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:53:36PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hallo,
> > >
> > > This change broke cross-bootstrapping glibc based systems from scratch. It adds an dependency
> > > to glibc to the gcc build (for stdlib.h and link.h in the target), but glibc cannot be built without
> > > an gcc build first and gcc needs installed glibc now. This is an problem when cross bootstrapping
> > > the x86-64 toolkit from scratch for example. Any ideas?
> >
> > See the generic part of
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg02605.html
> > patch.
>
> Could you elaborate. Which generic part do you mean exactly ?
Never mind. I see what you mean (missed the inhibit_libc flag on first
scanning)
Thanks,
-Andi