This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Not a bug, but a suggestion

From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
To: Michael McTernan <Michael dot McTernan dot 2001 at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Adrian von Bidder <avbidder at acter dot ch>, nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:42:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Not a bug, but a suggestion
References: <1011348791.5451.6.camel@atlas> <KLEOILIEPFIAMCPDAPCBKEPKCAAA.Michael.McTernan.2001@cs.bris.ac.uk>

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:36:45AM -0000, Michael McTernan wrote:
>Ooops,
>
>My fault for not looking fully - sorry guys!

And, as an added bonus 'gcc -o /dev/null ...' works fine under cygwin.

cgf

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adrian von Bidder [mailto:avbidder@acter.ch]
>> Sent: 18 January 2002 10:13
>> To: Michael McTernan
>> Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Not a bug, but a suggestion
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 21:16, Michael McTernan wrote:
>>>Hi Guys,
>>>
>>>GCC is great - well done.  Anyhow, now that gcc obseletes lint and
>>>similar programs (well, maybe not lclint, but that doesn't count) is it
>>>possible to add an option to gcc that will only print the warnings and
>>>errors in the usual way, but without actually writing anything?
>>
>>man gcc
>>
>>the -fsyntax-only option is documented and, imho, not really hidden.

-- 
Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions.
Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ .

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Not a bug, but a suggestion
  - From: Michael McTernan

References:
- Re: Not a bug, but a suggestion
  - From: Adrian von Bidder
- RE: Not a bug, but a suggestion
  - From: Michael McTernan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]