This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: pending/5283: BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>
To: Mark Swanson <swansma at yahoo dot com>
Cc: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:32:22 -0500
Subject: Re: pending/5283: BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
References: <20020105041810.1063.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20020105043255.7CE8622F5E@www.webservicesolutions.com>

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:21:38PM -0500, Mark Swanson wrote:
> Thanks for the response. But, what makes you think I didn't do that? The SMTP 
> To: header should prove I did exactly that.
> 
> ?

Did you change the Subject: header?  That messes up GNATS,
and your addendum created a messed up bug report.
Never change the Subject: header when replying to things
in GNATS.  GNATS is not too resilient unfortunately. :(

References:
- Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
  - From: rodrigc
- Re: pending/5283: [testcase] BTW, c++/5282 is different than c++/5238
  - From: Mark Swanson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]